Vis enkel innførsel

dc.contributor.authorPriya Uteng, Tanu
dc.contributor.authorJulsrud, Tom Erik
dc.contributor.authorGeorge, Cyriac Manapurathu
dc.coverage.spatialNorwaynb_NO
dc.date.accessioned2019-07-04T12:46:19Z
dc.date.available2019-07-04T12:46:19Z
dc.date.created2019-04-16T16:31:33Z
dc.date.issued2019-01-25
dc.identifier.citationTransportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment. 2019, 71 (June), 186-206.nb_NO
dc.identifier.issn1361-9209
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11250/2603431
dc.description.abstractThis paper builds on a survey of existing users of two car sharing schemes in Oslo, namely Nabobil (peer-to-peer scheme P2P) and Bilkollektivet (cooperative scheme Coop), to understand how the following factors lead to active (or passive) car sharing – i. key life-events; ii. adoption/retention challenges; iii. acceptability; and iv. infrastructural needs. The conceptual framework of this study is informed by mobility biographies and social practice theory. A web-based questionnaire was distributed by the two service providers to their members, and approximately 1,724 users of P2P and 1,117 users of Coop participated in the survey. The survey collected information on travel behaviour, preferences, life-stages, mobility biography of the household, and life-events possibly leading to car sharing. Results highlight that using P2P scheme emerged as statistically significant for students moving to Oslo and for employees starting in new jobs. For the Coop members, the birth of first or later children were statistically significant events in households’ decision to start with car sharing. Along with differences in meanings, skills, materiality and practices of carsharing, users of the two schemes varied with respect to spatial details as well – proximity to transit-stops, access to high-frequency public transport services, walking/cycling infrastructure and, parking facilities. Further, for carsharing to become popular, ample institutional trust, capable of off-setting any lack of trust that users may have, needs to be built.nb_NO
dc.language.isoengnb_NO
dc.publisherElseviernb_NO
dc.rightsAttribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 Internasjonal*
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/deed.no*
dc.titleThe role of life events and context in type of car share uptake: Comparing users of peer-to-peer and cooperative programs in Oslo, Norwaynb_NO
dc.typeJournal articlenb_NO
dc.typePeer reviewednb_NO
dc.rights.holder© 2019 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.nb_NO
dc.description.versionacceptedVersionnb_NO
cristin.unitcode7482,1,2,0
cristin.unitcode7482,1,1,0
cristin.unitcode7482,1,5,0
cristin.unitnameByutvikling og bytransport
cristin.unitnameReisevaner og mobilitet
cristin.unitnameMarked og styring
cristin.ispublishedtrue
cristin.fulltextpostprint
cristin.qualitycode2
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.trd.2019.01.009
dc.identifier.cristin1692981
dc.source.journalTransportation Research Part D: Transport and Environmentnb_NO
dc.source.volume71nb_NO
dc.source.issueJunenb_NO
dc.source.pagenumber186-206nb_NO
dc.relation.projectNorges forskningsråd: 255430nb_NO
dc.relation.projectNordisk Energiforskning: 77892nb_NO


Tilhørende fil(er)

Thumbnail

Denne innførselen finnes i følgende samling(er)

Vis enkel innførsel

Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 Internasjonal
Med mindre annet er angitt, så er denne innførselen lisensiert som Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 Internasjonal