dc.contributor.author | Minken, Harald | |
dc.coverage.spatial | Norway, Oslo | en_US |
dc.date.accessioned | 2023-06-14T08:51:23Z | |
dc.date.available | 2023-06-14T08:51:23Z | |
dc.date.created | 2016-09-05T09:37:20Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2016-06-24 | |
dc.identifier.citation | Economics of Transportation. 2016, 6 (June 2016), 11-17. | en_US |
dc.identifier.issn | 2212-0122 | |
dc.identifier.uri | https://hdl.handle.net/11250/3071294 | |
dc.description.abstract | We study the problem to maximise the net economic benefit of an investment plan by selecting from a portfolio of candidate projects within a given budget constraint. As is well known, with independent projects the economic efficiency of the entire investment plan is maximised if projects are selected according to their benefit-cost ratio until the budget is exhausted. Often, however, the planning of a project involves a stage where a set of alternative concepts or designs are considered. A best alternative is chosen, and the plan is composed from the pool of all such best alternatives. This procedure violates the assumptions underlying the benefit-cost ratio criterion. In this paper, we set out the correct criterion to use. A real-life example from Norwegian transport planning is provided to show how the global setting into which the project is going to compete, matters for the selection criterion to be used. | en_US |
dc.language.iso | eng | en_US |
dc.publisher | Elsevier Ltd | en_US |
dc.rights | Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 Internasjonal | * |
dc.rights.uri | http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/deed.no | * |
dc.subject | Project selection | en_US |
dc.subject | Mutually exclusive projects D61 | en_US |
dc.title | Project selection with sets of mutually exclusive alternatives | en_US |
dc.title.alternative | Project selection with sets of mutually exclusive alternatives | en_US |
dc.type | Journal article | en_US |
dc.type | Peer reviewed | en_US |
dc.rights.holder | © 2016 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved. | en_US |
dc.description.version | acceptedVersion | en_US |
cristin.ispublished | true | |
cristin.fulltext | postprint | |
cristin.qualitycode | 1 | |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.1016/j.ecotra.2016.06.001 | |
dc.identifier.cristin | 1377999 | |
dc.source.journal | Economics of Transportation | en_US |
dc.source.volume | 6 | en_US |
dc.source.issue | June 2016 | en_US |
dc.source.pagenumber | 11-17 | en_US |