Vis enkel innførsel

dc.contributor.authorEllingsen, Linda Ager-Wick
dc.contributor.authorThorne, Rebecca Jayne
dc.contributor.authorWind, Julia
dc.contributor.authorFigenbaum, Erik
dc.contributor.authorRomare, Mia
dc.contributor.authorNordelöf, Anders
dc.coverage.spatialNorway, Osloen_US
dc.date.accessioned2023-06-15T13:55:02Z
dc.date.available2023-06-15T13:55:02Z
dc.date.created2022-11-02T10:30:43Z
dc.date.issued2022-10-27
dc.identifier.citationTransportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment. 2022, 112 (November), 1-13.en_US
dc.identifier.issn1361-9209
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/11250/3071599
dc.descriptionLinda Ager-Wick Ellingsen, Rebecca Jayne Thorne, Julia Wind, Erik Figenbaum, Mia Romare, Anders Nordelöf, Life cycle assessment of battery electric buses, Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment, Volume 112, 2022, 103498, ISSN 1361-9209, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trd.2022.103498 (https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1361920922003248)en_US
dc.description.abstractDifferent Li-ion battery technologies and sizes are used in battery electric buses (BEBs), but little is known about the environmental effect of various battery technology and sizing alternatives. In a cradle-to-grave life cycle assessment of seven BEBs, we consider three battery technologies combined with relevant pack sizes to evaluate the size and range effect. The environmental performance of the BEBs was assessed over the typical length of a bus tender of 10 years as well as an extended lifetime of 20 years. Across six environmental impact categories we found that the size and range effect depends to a large extent on the performance of the battery technology and that a smaller battery size of the same technology is not necessarily environmentally preferable. Furthermore, extending the BEB lifetime from 10 to 20 years changes the environmental performance as well as relative contributions to environmental impact potentials for the various BEB alternatives.en_US
dc.language.isoengen_US
dc.publisherElsevieren_US
dc.rightsAttribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 Internasjonal*
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/deed.no*
dc.subjectBattery electric busen_US
dc.subjectLi-ion batteryen_US
dc.subjectLife cycle assessmenten_US
dc.subjectInventory dataen_US
dc.subjectCarbon footprinten_US
dc.subjectEnvironmental impacten_US
dc.titleLife cycle assessment of battery electric buses + Errata of 24. January 2023en_US
dc.title.alternativeLife cycle assessment of battery electric busesen_US
dc.typeJournal articleen_US
dc.typePeer revieweden_US
dc.rights.holder© 2022 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.en_US
dc.source.articlenumber103498, 103628en_US
dc.description.versionacceptedVersionen_US
cristin.ispublishedtrue
cristin.fulltextoriginal
cristin.qualitycode2
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.trd.2022.103498
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.trd.2023.103628
dc.identifier.cristin2067809
dc.source.journalTransportation Research Part D: Transport and Environmenten_US
dc.source.volume112en_US
dc.source.issueNovember 2022en_US
dc.source.pagenumber1-13en_US
dc.relation.projectNorges forskningsråd: 257653en_US


Tilhørende fil(er)

Thumbnail
Thumbnail

Denne innførselen finnes i følgende samling(er)

Vis enkel innførsel

Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 Internasjonal
Med mindre annet er angitt, så er denne innførselen lisensiert som Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 Internasjonal