Vis enkel innførsel

dc.contributor.authorBrandt, Rebecca Karstens
dc.contributor.authorHaustein, Sonja
dc.contributor.authorHagenzieker, Marjan Paula
dc.contributor.authorMøller, Mette
dc.date.accessioned2023-06-19T08:28:39Z
dc.date.available2023-06-19T08:28:39Z
dc.date.created2022-04-28T12:55:33Z
dc.date.issued2022-02-25
dc.identifier.citationTransportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour. 2022, 86 121-130.en_US
dc.identifier.issn1369-8478
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/11250/3071991
dc.descriptionRebecca Karstens Brandt, Sonja Haustein, Marjan Hagenzieker, Mette Møller, Cyclists’ handheld phone use and traffic rule knowledge, Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour, Volume 86, 2022, Pages 121-130, ISSN 1369-8478, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trf.2022.02.004 (https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1369847822000225)en_US
dc.description.abstractPhone use is likely to distract cyclists and possibly increase crash risk. Therefore, handheld phone use among cyclists is forbidden by law in some countries, even though cyclists use compensatory strategies to attempt to mitigate distractions and related effects. Both demographic, environmental, and psychological factors have been associated with cyclists’ phone use. This study extends the existing literature by including traffic rule beliefs as an explanatory measure in predicting cyclists’ handheld phone use and additionally explores how well cyclists know these rules in different legislative contexts. Online questionnaire responses were collected in 2019 among 1055 cyclists living in Denmark (N = 568), where handheld phone use for cyclists was forbidden, and in the Netherlands (N = 487), where it was legal. Responses on phone use, traffic rule knowledge, cycling behaviour, demographic, and psychological measures were used to identify factors contributing to the likelihood of handheld phone use in three regression models; one for all respondents and one for each country. In the combined model, believing there are no rules on handheld phone use increased the likelihood of handheld phone use while cycling. Other significant factors were subjective norm, perceived behavioural difficulty, self-identity as a safe cyclist as well as demographic factors. The country-specific models found that male gender was only associated with more handheld phone use in the Netherlands, while believing there was no ban was only connected to an increase in the likelihood of using handheld phone in Denmark. Correct traffic rule knowledge was almost three times higher in Denmark, where handheld phone use was forbidden. The results identify subjective norms, potential overconfidence, and traffic rule awareness (when there is a ban) as relevant factors in reducing the likelihood of cyclists’ handheld phone use. Findings from country-specific models possibly point to a connection between culture and traffic rules. Future research should focus on underlying mechanisms and awareness of traffic rules.en_US
dc.language.isoengen_US
dc.publisherElsevieren_US
dc.rightsNavngivelse 4.0 Internasjonal*
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/deed.no*
dc.subjectCyclist safetyen_US
dc.subjectPhone useen_US
dc.subjectDistractionsen_US
dc.subjectTraffic rule knowledgeen_US
dc.titleCyclists’ handheld phone use and traffic rule knowledgeen_US
dc.title.alternativeCyclists’ handheld phone use and traffic rule knowledgeen_US
dc.typeJournal articleen_US
dc.typePeer revieweden_US
dc.rights.holder© 2022 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd.en_US
dc.description.versionpublishedVersionen_US
cristin.ispublishedtrue
cristin.fulltextoriginal
cristin.qualitycode1
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.trf.2022.02.004
dc.identifier.cristin2019802
dc.source.journalTransportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviouren_US
dc.source.volume86en_US
dc.source.issueApril 2022en_US
dc.source.pagenumber121-130en_US


Tilhørende fil(er)

Thumbnail

Denne innførselen finnes i følgende samling(er)

Vis enkel innførsel

Navngivelse 4.0 Internasjonal
Med mindre annet er angitt, så er denne innførselen lisensiert som Navngivelse 4.0 Internasjonal