Vis enkel innførsel

dc.contributor.authorHesjevoll, Ingeborg Storesund
dc.contributor.authorFyhri, Aslak
dc.contributor.authorCiccone, Alice
dc.coverage.spatialNorway, Osloen_US
dc.date.accessioned2023-06-20T12:56:41Z
dc.date.available2023-06-20T12:56:41Z
dc.date.created2021-12-06T14:49:05Z
dc.date.issued2021-12-04
dc.identifier.citationTransportation Research Interdisciplinary Perspectives (TRIP). 2021, 12 (December 2021), 1-17.en_US
dc.identifier.issn2590-1982
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/11250/3072314
dc.descriptionIngeborg Storesund Hesjevoll, Aslak Fyhri, Alice Ciccone, App-based automatic collection of travel behaviour: A field study comparison with self-reported behaviour, Transportation Research Interdisciplinary Perspectives, Volume 12, 2021, 100501, ISSN 2590-1982, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trip.2021.100501 (https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2590198221002062)en_US
dc.description.abstractSmart phone apps hold great promise for travel behaviour research, but their performance relative to traditional methods is still not well understood. The aim of this study is to evaluate the magnitude and direction of differences between travel behaviour from a completely automatic travel mode detection mobile app and a traditional travel behaviour survey. We present data from n = 230 participants who used the app (sense.dat) for four weeks. Participants also completed a one-day travel diary and one-week retrospective account of cycling and walking in the same period. Correspondence between app and survey varied across levels of aggregation and modalities. Overall, the app recorded substantially more km, minutes and non-zero trip days than the one-day survey, but when split up by mode this was not true for public transport. On the individual level there was a tendency for the app to register modes not self-reported by the respondents for all modes except public transport, possibly indicating that the app captures trips that the user may have forgot or intentionally left out. For bike, car and foot, the Spearman correlations between app and survey registered (one-day) distances and durations were moderate (r > 0.5) or strong (r > 0.8) when based on observations that were non-zero in both data sources, and moderate or weak when based on all observations. For one-week reports of active transport modes, app-survey correlations were lower than for the one-day data, especially for foot.en_US
dc.language.isoengen_US
dc.publisherElsevieren_US
dc.rightsAttribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 Internasjonal*
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/deed.no*
dc.subjectTravel behavioren_US
dc.subjectSmartphone applicationen_US
dc.subjectSelf-reporten_US
dc.subjectTravel survey data collectionen_US
dc.titleApp-based automatic collection of travel behaviour: A field study comparison with self-reported behaviouren_US
dc.typeJournal articleen_US
dc.typePeer revieweden_US
dc.rights.holder© 2021 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier Ltd.en_US
dc.source.articlenumber100501en_US
dc.description.versionpublishedVersionen_US
cristin.ispublishedtrue
cristin.fulltextoriginal
cristin.qualitycode1
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.trip.2021.100501
dc.identifier.cristin1965158
dc.source.journalTransportation Research Interdisciplinary Perspectives (TRIP)en_US
dc.source.volume12en_US
dc.source.issueDecember 2021en_US
dc.source.pagenumber1-17en_US
dc.relation.projectNorges forskningsråd: 267855en_US


Tilhørende fil(er)

Thumbnail

Denne innførselen finnes i følgende samling(er)

Vis enkel innførsel

Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 Internasjonal
Med mindre annet er angitt, så er denne innførselen lisensiert som Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 Internasjonal