Vis enkel innførsel

dc.contributor.authorDe Ceunynck, Tim
dc.contributor.authorPelssers, Brecht
dc.contributor.authorBjørnskau, Torkel
dc.contributor.authorAasvik, Ole
dc.contributor.authorFyhri, Aslak
dc.contributor.authorLaureshyn, Aliaksei
dc.contributor.authorJohnsson, Carl
dc.contributor.authorHagenzieker, Marjan Paula
dc.contributor.authorMartensen, Heike
dc.date.accessioned2023-06-15T13:05:04Z
dc.date.available2023-06-15T13:05:04Z
dc.date.created2022-11-04T15:32:19Z
dc.date.issued2022-08-03
dc.identifier.issn2004-3082
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/11250/3071586
dc.descriptionDe Ceunynck, T., Pelssers, B., Bjørnskau, T., Aasvik, O., Fyhri, A., Laureshyn, A., Johnsson, C., Hagenzieker, M., & Martensen, H. (2022). Interact or counteract? Behavioural observation of interactions between vulnerable road users and autonomous shuttles in Oslo, Norway. Traffic Safety Research, 2, 000008. https://doi.org/10.55329/fbhr3456en_US
dc.description.abstractThe current paper presents the results of behavioural observations in a field experiment with automated shuttles in Oslo, Norway. Video observations were conducted at five fixed locations along a challenging 1.2 km automated shuttle line with varying traffic conditions. Observed interactions between vulnerable road users and automated shuttles were coded using a predefined codebook, which allowed a structured quantitative analysis. The paper identified several potentially risky types of situations in which the automated shuttles did not always behave according to the traffic rules. Generally, the automated shuttles failed to give way to pedestrians at pedestrian crossings in 26%–50% of the interactions. Right-turning shuttles failed to yield to cyclists going straight in 38% of the interactions at observation Site 1 (the only location where the automated shuttle takes a right turn). In majority of same direction interactions between cyclists and automated shuttles, the interactions resulted in the cyclist overtaking the automated shuttle, usually on the left-hand side. Generally, the paper found little evidence of road users trying to bully or otherwise take advantage of the defensive driving style of the automated shuttles and identified only a limited number of interactions in which a vulnerable road user behaved ignorant or aggressive towards the automated shuttles. In addition, the paper found very little indication of temporal effects that suggest changes in the interaction patterns over time.en_US
dc.language.isoengen_US
dc.publisherLunds universitets [University Publisher], Institutionen för teknik och samhälle [Imprint]en_US
dc.rightsNavngivelse 4.0 Internasjonal*
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/deed.no*
dc.subjectautomated shuttlesen_US
dc.subjectautonomous vehiclesen_US
dc.subjectdriverless shuttlesen_US
dc.subjectroad user interactionsen_US
dc.subjectvulnerable road usersen_US
dc.titleInteract or counteract? Behavioural observation of interactions between vulnerable road users and autonomous shuttles in Oslo, Norwayen_US
dc.title.alternativeInteract or counteract? Behavioural observation of interactions between vulnerable road users and autonomous shuttles in Oslo, Norwayen_US
dc.typeJournal articleen_US
dc.typePeer revieweden_US
dc.rights.holder© 2022 Tim De Ceunynck, Brecht Pelssers, Torkel Bjørnskau, Ole Aasvik, Aslak Fyhri, Aliaksei Laureshyn, Carl Johnsson, Marjan Hagenzieker, Heike Martensenen_US
dc.source.articlenumber000008en_US
dc.description.versionpublishedVersionen_US
cristin.ispublishedtrue
cristin.fulltextoriginal
cristin.qualitycode1
dc.identifier.doi10.55329/fbhr3456
dc.identifier.cristin2069378
dc.source.journalTraffic Safety Research (TSR)en_US
dc.source.volume2en_US
dc.source.pagenumber1-24en_US
dc.relation.projectNorges forskningsråd: 283338en_US


Tilhørende fil(er)

Thumbnail

Denne innførselen finnes i følgende samling(er)

Vis enkel innførsel

Navngivelse 4.0 Internasjonal
Med mindre annet er angitt, så er denne innførselen lisensiert som Navngivelse 4.0 Internasjonal